Two of Estee Lauder's best sellers, read on five public ingredient databases: 1 of 2 got different verdicts from different databases.
SlipperSkin finding
Read on 21 and 23 October 2026, 1 of 2 Estee Lauder products got different clean-or-flagged verdicts from EWG Skin Deep, INCIdecoder, SkinSAFE and Skincarisma; their mean EWG hazard score was 3.5 and mean Skincarisma score 98.
They agree on 1 and split on 1. EWG Skin Deep scores hazard from 1 to 10 (1 to 2 is its low band); INCIdecoder names the ingredients it rates "icky"; SkinSAFE rates freedom from common allergens (100 is its top); Skincarisma scores from EWG's ingredient ratings out of 100. 1 of 2 get SkinSAFE's top rating.
Estee Lauder: the verdict grid2 products, four databases, read 21 and 23 October 2026
clean on that database
flagged
not listed
Values in the cells are each database's own figure. Blush is flagged, glass is clean, dashed is not listed.
What does each database say, product by product?
Estee Lauder Advanced Night Repair Synchronized Multi-Recovery Complex
Split verdict: 2 of 4 databases flag it. Fragrance-free on 3 of 5 databases. Read 23 October 2026.
Formulas change and databases keep the list they were given. Where one database's ingredient list differs from the others on a clear marker (parabens or fragrance), or EWG labels its listing with a formulation year, we show it here as a question, not a finding: a majority of published lists is evidence, not proof of the current formula.
Estee Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation: EWG Skin Deep lists fragrance (1 lists with / 4 without; EWG Skin Deep date January 2026)