Two of Peter Thomas Roth's best sellers, read on five public ingredient databases: every one got different verdicts from different databases.
SlipperSkin finding
Read on 21 and 23 October 2026, 2 of 2 Peter Thomas Roth products got different clean-or-flagged verdicts from EWG Skin Deep, INCIdecoder, SkinSAFE and Skincarisma; their mean EWG hazard score was 3 and mean Skincarisma score 98.
How do the ingredient apps rate Peter Thomas Roth?
They do not agree on any of them. EWG Skin Deep scores hazard from 1 to 10 (1 to 2 is its low band); INCIdecoder names the ingredients it rates "icky"; SkinSAFE rates freedom from common allergens (100 is its top); Skincarisma scores from EWG's ingredient ratings out of 100. 0 of 2 get SkinSAFE's top rating.
Peter Thomas Roth: the verdict grid2 products, four databases, read 21 and 23 October 2026
clean on that database
flagged
not listed
Values in the cells are each database's own figure. Blush is flagged, glass is clean, dashed is not listed.
What does each database say, product by product?
Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream
Split verdict: 2 of 4 databases flag it. Fragrance-free on 3 of 5 databases. Read 23 October 2026.
EWG Skin Deep
1 of 10 (its listings range 1 to 4)Limited data, updated April 2023