Two of Rare Beauty's best sellers, read on five public ingredient databases: every one got different verdicts from different databases.
SlipperSkin finding
Read on 21 and 23 October 2026, 2 of 2 Rare Beauty products got different clean-or-flagged verdicts from EWG Skin Deep, INCIdecoder, SkinSAFE and Skincarisma; their mean EWG hazard score was 2 and mean Skincarisma score 98.
They do not agree on any of them. EWG Skin Deep scores hazard from 1 to 10 (1 to 2 is its low band); INCIdecoder names the ingredients it rates "icky"; SkinSAFE rates freedom from common allergens (100 is its top); Skincarisma scores from EWG's ingredient ratings out of 100. 0 of 2 get SkinSAFE's top rating.
Rare Beauty: the verdict grid2 products, four databases, read 21 and 23 October 2026
clean on that database
flagged
not listed
Values in the cells are each database's own figure. Blush is flagged, glass is clean, dashed is not listed.
What does each database say, product by product?
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush
Split verdict: 1 of 4 databases flag it. Fragrance-free on 4 of 5 databases. Read 23 October 2026.
EWG Skin Deep
2 of 10 (its listings range 2 to 3)Limited data, updated August 2025
Formulas change and databases keep the list they were given. Where one database's ingredient list differs from the others on a clear marker (parabens or fragrance), or EWG labels its listing with a formulation year, we show it here as a question, not a finding: a majority of published lists is evidence, not proof of the current formula.