SlipperSkin For app makers
Ingredient apps · Original study

The EU bans 1,736 cosmetic entries and FDA's page names 11: what the gap means

8 of FDA's 11 named entries have a counterpart in the EU's Annex II, and only 12 of Annex II's 1,736 entries match one, 0.7%. FDA says that is not the whole picture; here is what it does say.

Figures read
23 October 2026, on makers' own pages
Next review
January 2027
Compiled and verified by
Vincent Wesley Couey ORCID
Published
23 October 2026

SlipperSkin finding

Read on 23 October 2026, 8 of FDA's 11 named entries have a counterpart in EU Annex II, which lists 1,736 prohibited entries: 12 of them match an FDA entry and 1,724 are not named on FDA's page.

From FDA’s page and the EU Cosmetics Regulation as consolidated on 1 May 2026, both read in Chrome on 23 October 2026; the counts are ours, computed from the Annex II export. FDA's page showed "content current as of 02/25/2022".

How many cosmetic ingredients does the EU ban compared with FDA?

Different lists, so different numbers:

  1. EU: Annex II of the Cosmetics Regulation lists 1,736 prohibited entries, some written as groups ("and its salts").
  2. FDA: its page names 11 entries it prohibits or restricts, and says cosmetic ingredients other than colour additives do not need FDA approval before sale.
  3. California: bans 24 chemicals from 2025 and a second list of 19 entries from 2027 (Health and Safety Code section 108980), every named one also in the EU's Annex II (the full comparison).
Three lists, three sizesread 23 October 2026
Size of three official lists, read 23 October 2026: EU Annex II, consolidated 1 May 2026, 1,736 prohibited entries; California's 2025 and 2027 lists, 43 chemicals and entries; FDA's prohibited and restricted page, 11 headed entries.EU Annex II, prohibited entries1,736California, 2025 and 2027 lists43FDA page, headed entries11Units differ: entries, chemicals and regulations. Read 23 October 2026.
The EU counts prohibited entries, California chemicals and entries, FDA headed regulations, so the bars show scope rather than strictness.

What is actually on FDA's list?

Eleven entries on FDA’s page: bithionol, chlorofluorocarbon propellants, chloroform, halogenated salicylanilides, hexachlorophene, mercury compounds, methylene chloride, prohibited cattle materials, sunscreens in cosmetics, vinyl chloride and zirconium-containing complexes. 8 of them have a counterpart in EU Annex II; the other 3 do not: chlorofluorocarbon propellants, prohibited cattle materials, sunscreens in cosmetics. Two of those are not substance bans at all (a propellant rule and a sunscreen labelling rule), and the cattle entry concerns animal-derived material. The counterpart is the same substance, not always the same rule: FDA limits mercury compounds to eye-area products at 65 parts per million and allows hexachlorophene only under conditions, while the EU lists hexachlorophene in Annex II as prohibited, and mercury and its compounds too, except the special cases its entry points to in Annex V. FDA's vinyl chloride and zirconium entries concern aerosol products.

FDA's 11 entries against the EU's listread 23 October 2026
FDA's 11 headed entries and the EU Annex II entry for the same substance, read 23 October 2026: Bithionol, prohibited, Annex II 352; Chlorofluorocarbon propellants, prohibited in aerosols, no matching Annex II entry; Chloroform, prohibited, with an exception, Annex II 366; Halogenated salicylanilides, prohibited, Annex II 348, 349, 350, 351, 373; Hexachlorophene, restricted, Annex II 371; Mercury compounds, restricted, Annex II 221; Methylene chloride, named as harmful, Annex II 1389; Prohibited cattle materials, prohibited (BSE), no matching Annex II entry; Sunscreens in cosmetics, a labelling rule, no matching Annex II entry; Vinyl chloride, prohibited in aerosols, Annex II 334; Zirconium-containing complexes, prohibited in aerosols, Annex II 391.What FDA's page saysEU Annex II entryBithionolprohibited352Chlorofluorocarbon propellantsprohibited in aerosolsno matching entryChloroformprohibited, with an exception366Halogenated salicylanilidesprohibited348 to 351, 373Hexachlorophenerestricted371Mercury compoundsrestricted221Methylene chloridenamed as harmful1389Prohibited cattle materialsprohibited (BSE)no matching entrySunscreens in cosmeticsa labelling ruleno matching entryVinyl chlorideprohibited in aerosols334Zirconium-containing complexesprohibited in aerosols391A counterpart is the same substance, not the same rule.
A filled dot means FDA's entry has an EU Annex II counterpart; the reference numbers are the regulation's own.
FDA's 11 headed entries, read 23 October 2026, and the EU Annex II entry for the same substance
FDA entryWhat FDA's page says21 CFREU Annex II
Bithionolprohibited700.11352
Chlorofluorocarbon propellantsprohibited in aerosols700.23none
Chloroformprohibited, with an exception700.18366
Halogenated salicylanilidesprohibited700.15348, 349, 350, 351, 373
Hexachlorophenerestricted250.250371
Mercury compoundsrestricted700.13221
Methylene chloridenamed as harmful700.191389
Prohibited cattle materialsprohibited (BSE)700.27none
Sunscreens in cosmeticsa labelling rule700.35none
Vinyl chlorideprohibited in aerosols700.14334
Zirconium-containing complexesprohibited in aerosols700.16391

How big is the gap, entry for entry?

Going the other way, only 12 of Annex II's 1,736 entries match something FDA's page names, 0.7%, and 1,724 are not named there. The grid draws every Annex II entry in reference order; the filled squares are the 12. Nothing here says the other entries are harmless or that FDA permits them.

All 1,736 EU Annex II entries12 also named by FDA
A grid of all 1,736 EU Annex II entries in reference order, read 23 October 2026. 12 are filled: entries for a substance that FDA's page also names (Annex II references 352, 366, 348, 349, 350, 351, 373, 371, 221, 1389, 334, 391). The other 1,724 are not named on FDA's page.One square per Annex II entry, in reference order12 entries FDA also names1,724 it does not
Reference order is the regulation's own numbering, so the filled squares show where the shared substances sit in it, not a ranking.

Not by FDA's own account. Its page says it is against the law for a cosmetic to contain any ingredient that makes the product harmful when used as directed or in the customary way, whether or not a regulation specifically prohibits or restricts that ingredient. It also has separate sections on colour additives, which are approved, and on drug ingredients. So the 1,724 unnamed entries are not on FDA's ingredient page; that is a fact about the page, not a ruling on each substance. See each ingredient's file for the lists it sits on: chloroform (PubChem), mercury (PubChem), formaldehyde and hydroquinone are good places to start, or search all of Annex II.

Reading "banned in the EU" claims
1. Ask which list: Annex II has 1,736 entries, FDA's
   page 11, California's 2025 and 2027 lists 43.
2. A group entry ("and its salts") covers more
   chemicals than it counts as entries.
3. "Not named by FDA" is not "legal": FDA says any
   harmful ingredient is unlawful, named or not.
4. A counterpart is not the same rule: aerosol-only
   or restricted in the US can be banned in the EU.
5. Look the ingredient up, then read its entry.

Who should read which list?

How we compared the lists

Method

On 23 October 2026 we read FDA's prohibited and restricted ingredients page in Chrome and exported the EU Cosmetics Regulation's Annex II (consolidated 1 May 2026, 1,736 entries after the 25 marked "Moved or deleted") row by row from EUR-Lex. For each FDA entry that names a substance we searched Annex II by CAS number and by name; entries with no match, and the two that are not substance bans, are shown as having none. The CFR sections cited on FDA's page were checked against the eCFR. We counted entries, not chemicals: group entries cover more compounds than they count. We have not assessed any substance's safety, and nothing here is legal advice.

If you are reading labels

Basics for an ingredient-conscious routine

Fragrance-free moisturizerFragrance is the first thing many label readers cut; start with a plain formula.Fragrance-freeView on Amazon → Mineral sunscreenZinc oxide or titanium dioxide are the filters mineral formulas use; check the active list on the label.Zinc oxide or titanium dioxideView on Amazon → Gentle cleanserA simple cleanser gives you a clean baseline before you add or change a product.Few ingredientsView on Amazon → Patch-test swabsTest a new product behind the ear before the face; swabs keep the test small and clean.Test before you commitView on Amazon →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

FAQ

How many cosmetic ingredients does the EU ban compared with the US?

The EU's Annex II lists 1,736 prohibited entries (consolidated 1 May 2026); FDA's prohibited and restricted ingredients page names 11 entries and says cosmetic ingredients other than colour additives need no FDA approval before sale. The units differ: some Annex II entries are groups.

Are the ingredients FDA names also banned in the EU?

8 of FDA's 11 entries have an Annex II counterpart (bithionol, chloroform, hexachlorophene, mercury, methylene chloride, vinyl chloride, the salicylanilides and zirconium compounds), though the rules differ: FDA limits mercury compounds and hexachlorophene where the EU prohibits them.

Is an ingredient legal in the US if FDA does not name it?

Not necessarily. FDA's page says it is against the law for a cosmetic to contain any ingredient that makes the product harmful when used as directed, whether or not a regulation names that ingredient. Colour additives and drug ingredients are covered in separate sections.

How many EU Annex II entries does FDA also name?

12 of 1,736, 0.7%, by our match on CAS number and name, read 23 October 2026. The other 1,724 are not named on FDA's page.

Where can I search the EU banned list?

We indexed Annex II of the EU Cosmetics Regulation, consolidated 1 May 2026, with a filter by name or CAS number and a CSV download, at slipperskin.com/eu-banned-cosmetic-ingredients.

Bottom line

The EU's ban list is long and FDA's named list is short, and the two overlap on 12 substances. That is a fact about two documents, not a verdict on any ingredient. Look an ingredient up on the lists that matter to you, read what each says and when, and treat a score or a viral number as a pointer, not a ruling. If FDA, the EU or anyone else spots something here that is out of date, tell us through the contact page and we will correct it with the date.

Related on SlipperSkin

DataIngredient filesSixty-six ingredients against the statute, the EU, FDA and EWG.IndexEU banned cosmetic ingredientsAll 1,736 Annex II entries, searchable.StudyCalifornia, the EU and FDA against EWGFour lists and a hazard score, compared.FilesIngredient filesEach ingredient against the law, dated and linked.
☆ Save
Dashboard